You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘wikileaks’ tag.

Since news broke over the weekend the internet has been awash with talk of “Trapwire”, a computer system recently developed to track individuals and activities using surveillance cameras. Though Trapwire’s been known about for years now, it wasn’t until the last batch of Stratfor (global “private intelligence” gurus) emails hit Wikileaks that people really began to panic. As Fred Burton tells it, this system is already in place across numerous American, Canadian and British cities, guarding all manner of “highly valued” potential terrorist targets.

The reaction has been mixed. Many, such as Anonymous, are terrified and incensed, vowing to take down this technological leviathan. Others, such as the mainstream press, have been doing all they can to downplay the dangers. The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle, but I’m inclined toward the former. This may not quite be “Skynet”, yet, but there’s more than enough reasons to panic. For starters, Wikileaks has been bombarded with a heavy DDOS attack all weekend (10GB/second, allegedly), which has prevented many from seeing the actual emails in question. Second, at least one of the emails admits that the system is directed at “activists” as well as terrorists.

What does Trapwire actually do? The main purpose seems to be identifying “terrorists” near specific sites by scanning internet-connected cameras for signs that someone may be “casing” the target (surveying and studying). As someone who’s spent much of the last week wandering around taking pictures of famous sites (like any tourist), this scares me a little. Other claims, such as whether Trapwire is connected into facial recognition software or social media databases seem less clear. It certainly seems that it isn’t quite as bad as Anonymous’ communiqe is suggesting, but at the same time, it’s unquestionably a step in that direction.

This isn’t just about Trapwire. It’s one system built by one company in use for one purpose, however Orwellian. The problem is, these kinds of technological abilities are growing at a frghtening speed. A decade ago, facial recognition software was a pipe dream, mostly because they’d never be able to amass enough photos to scan for more than a few individuals. It would literally have taken a mass-effort on behalf from millions of people uploading photos, selecting faces an typing names. Then came Facebook. Surveillance cameras, too, have multiplied faster than tribbles, fallen dramatically in price and improved dramatically in quality. Then there’s all the other systems – Echelon and the like, used for data-mining, wiretapping and other tasks which have also been installed. Surveillance is evolving very rapidly, and the technological and financial barriers are falling faster every day.

Years ago I visited the old headquarters of the Stasi, the former East German secret police renowned for being possibly the most terrifying domestic spying agency in history. It’s now a museum, filled with what now seem like quaint relics of a 1950s spy film (you can watch a guided tour while eating lunch, featuring Roger Moore!). Were cameras hidden in birdfeeders really so evil? Or their enormous collection of rags in jars which carefully preserved individuals’ scents? Of course not – but in the context of an agency who saw no problem keeping “files” on millions of citizens, almost half the population, they were utterly terrifying. We might never know how many people died in prison as a result of those birdfeeder-cameras, and there’s a horrifying lesson to be learned about how many eyes we want to grant violent and paranoid governments. Today, we’re fast approaching a digital profiling system which scans everybody, all the time, for the slightest eye movements or keywords in private conversations which might indicate “terrorist” intent, without any human oversight until it comes time for arrests.

Does that make you feel safe?

America faced the loss of over one million homes in 2010, not from an earthquake, flood or tsunami, but from it’s own banking system. Foreclosure filings reached nearly three million, continuing their rise, and are expected to do so through 2011. In Nevada, one in eleven housing units faced a notice.

The causes of the “mortgage meltdown” are common knowledge at this point – careless lending, securitization and a fundamentally unhealthy economy. None of these choices were made by working-class America, nearly all by bankers, investors and government officials. And while those officials were able to “bail out” many failing banks and corporations with public money, very little went to simply stop people from losing their homes.

This is far from surprising for America. These economic shockwaves are hitting an already traumatized population. Though America is the world’s richest nation overall, it also has some of the worst poverty in the industrialized world. These folks are already dealing with one of the sparsest social safety nets in the industrialized world (the only one without public Health Care etc), waves of crippling globalization-related shutdowns (the Rust Belt), the Wal-Mart and suburbanization of their cities and economies and a mind-blowing military budget. Foreclosures are the last thing the American Populace needs.

Any day now, Julian Assange is threatening that the next big Wikileaks release will be from inside a “major American bank”, and claims to evidence of an “ecosystem of corruption”. For those who’ve lost homes since the “meltdown”, these revelations will probably not be taken well.

It’s only a matter of time before North America begins to see the kind of “austerity” – related riots and rebellions which have rocked Europe for the past few months. The blatant greed and corruption shown by governments, banks and corporations can no longer be hidden behind a compliant press – we are far too connected these days. And if this makes life uncomfortable for those who’ve embezzled billions from the public, then they have only themselves to blame.

It’s hard not to love wikileaks. Ever since the internet began, powerful interests have been cracking down on employees who all this communications equipment to spread their dirty secrets. Lawsuits, charges and the like are their favourite weapons. And it seems to be working fairly well at keeping department store employees quiet about which products always come back to the returns desk.

Unfortunately, it doesn”t seem to be working so well for larger issues. I’ve been a fan of Wikileaks for a while now. But recently, when they published over 90 thousand secret documents about the Afghan War, they crossed a very serious line. One day, they were at the mercy of major worldwide government institutions. Now, those tables have turned.

Will the American government and others (perhaps the Australians) go after wikileaks for this? Probably. But it will quickly be overshadowed by their own trials. It turns out there’s been a few more massacres than they’d been letting on.

Here’s an excellent piece by John Pilger which I feel sums it up nicely.

If only these guys had been around during Vietnam.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


RSS Newsfeed


Building a new world from the bones of the old one.

Hamilton Urban Forest Coalition

Promoting the protection, enhancement and appreciation of urban forests in the City of Hamilton

The Laboratory of Insurrectionary Imagination

“This is not a normal travelling theatre company you know!” Scotland Yard.

Knowing the Land is Resistance

Based in the remaining Carolinian forest, nestled between Lake Ontario and the Niagara Escarpment...

Narrative Resistance

fighting back against dominant stories

Warrior Publications

Purpose: To promote warrior culture, fighting spirit, and resistance movements